Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-06-18 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 is much better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 85 score against 77. The Galaxy M40 is a a little bit heavier device than LG G7 Fit, but both are 0.31inches thick. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M40 has 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. Galaxy M40 features a greater storage for apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has more cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has a much more MP back facing camera, a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments and a bigger sensor.
Galaxy M40 has a bit better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 17 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.