Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 85 score against 83.1. These phones have the same Android 10 OS. Despite of the fact that Galaxy M40 is older than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a bit bigger display and a greater pixels density.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.