Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 has a general score of 85, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M40 has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Galaxy M40's construction is a little thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released 5 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M40, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels quantity in each screen inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little larger display.
The Galaxy A25 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy M40, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.