Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M40's score of 85. Galaxy A52's design is newer than the Galaxy M40's, but it is a bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy M40 and Samsung Galaxy A52 feature very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A52 has a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M40, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M40. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy A52 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy M40, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.