Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Galaxy M40, with a score of 91.3 against 85. The Galaxy A52 5G body is newer than Galaxy M40's, but it's heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Galaxy M40 has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy M40 and the Galaxy A52 5G both feature extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a little lower pixel number in each display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M40, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M40. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A52 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.