Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M40, having a general score of 86.3 against 85. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M40, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M40, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M40. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rate, a tinier aperture and a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy M40 and Samsung Galaxy S10e have quite similar storage for applications and games, both have the same internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M40 has a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.