Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Samsung Galaxy M40, getting a global score of 95.4 against 85. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer, but way heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy M40. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M40 has Android 10.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy M40 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy M40 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs, a way higher video quality and a much more MP back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy M40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.