Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-18 | -- |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M40's 85 overall score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is incredibly lighter and notably thinner than Samsung Galaxy M40. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M40 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a quite higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M40 features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much more mega pixels back camera, a much better video definition and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.