Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M40, getting a score of 92.3 against 85. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is newer and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy M40's, although it's just a little heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M40 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy M40, because it has a bit better display density, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy M40 counts with a slightly better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M40 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a way higher 32 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy M40 features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.