Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, having a score of 85 against 79.5. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version and Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy M40's construction is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, even though it was released 4 years before.
Samsung Galaxy M40 features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy M40 features a superior camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 32 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video. The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.