Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is much better than the vivo X70 Pro's overall score of 78.3. Even being the best we are comparing here, the Galaxy M51 body is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the vivo X70 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X70 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X70 Pro features a little sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.