Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-04-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy M53 5G, with a score of 83.7 against 76.7. The LG V50 ThinQ is a way older, just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Galaxy M53 5G. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the display. LG V50 ThinQ has a way better performance than Galaxy M53 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier sensor offering a lot lower image quality and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy M53 5G has better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.