Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 74.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-11-26 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Honor View30 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 74.6. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is just a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the Honor View30 Pro, and both were released with only 9 months difference.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper display than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a just a bit better display pixel density and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better processor than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.