Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.91 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-11-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.01 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 11.76, which is much better than HTC U11 life's 8.91 overall score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body has the same thickness than HTC U11 life, but it's way heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than HTC U11 life, because it has a much bigger display, a just a little greater pixel density and a way better 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than HTC U11 life, because it has a much better video quality, a way more MP back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the HTC U11 life, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.