Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2015-01-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gray and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 185.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the LG G Flex 2, getting a general score of 98.9 against 75.2. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a notably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the LG G Flex 2, although it's way heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, counting with a couple additional features and a performance increase.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, a lot smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bit processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a really longer battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, because it has a way more megapixels back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.