Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-02-12 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gray, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.22mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is somewhat heavier than LG G Pro 2, it's a little thinner and also incredibly newer.
LG G Pro 2 has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, a little smaller display and a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processor than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a way larger back camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures, a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light photos, a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot better video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than LG G Pro 2, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.