Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 72.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-07-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 72.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably heavier than the LG G3 Cat. 6, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster CPU than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. LG G3 Cat. 6 features a brighter screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite better number of pixels in each inch in the display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better battery life than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.