Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.06 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 11.76, which is way better than LG K50's 9.06 general score. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is heavier than LG K50, it's a little thinner and newer. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than LG K50, because it has a quite bigger screen, a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better performance than LG K50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than LG K50, because it has a way bigger sensor, a larger aperture, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K50 counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra one, although the LG K50 has a 22% smaller battery size.