Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.91 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-06 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.17 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 174.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than LG K51, with a global score of 11.76 against 8.91. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 11 version while LG K51 has Android 10 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and LG K51 were released only a couple months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is just a bit thinner but a little heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better performance than LG K51, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than LG K51, because it has a little bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a much better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior memory for games and applications than LG K51, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The LG K51 counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than LG K51, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG K51, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG K51. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG K51, letting go a couple specs and features.