Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.99 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-08-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek MT6750S chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the LG Q Stylus, having a 11.76 score against 8.99. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is notably newer and a little thinner than the LG Q Stylus's, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 11 version while LG Q Stylus has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better display than LG Q Stylus, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger display and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than LG Q Stylus, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater processing power than LG Q Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Q Stylus features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a 27 percent smaller battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than LG Q Stylus, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution.