Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-08-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek MT6750S chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the LG Q Stylus, having a 98.9 score against 71.5. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is notably newer and a little thinner than the LG Q Stylus's, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while LG Q Stylus has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater processing power than LG Q Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better display than LG Q Stylus, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger display and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than LG Q Stylus, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than LG Q Stylus, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than LG Q Stylus, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.