Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.06 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-08-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 205.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 11.76, which is a lot better than LG Q6's overall score of 9.06. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body has the same thickness than the LG Q6, but it's much heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite better performance than LG Q6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than LG Q6, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bigger display and a bit better pixels quantity per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than LG Q6, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG Q6, because it has a lot better video quality, a bigger aperture for better photos in low light situations and a much more megapixels camera. LG Q6 has just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Q6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Q6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the LG Q6, resigning some features and specs.