Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-06-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.73 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek MT6750 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the LG Q7, getting a general score of 98.9 against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner, but way heavier than the LG Q7. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while LG Q7 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than LG Q7, because it has a little higher display pixels density, a larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better CPU than LG Q7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than LG Q7, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than LG Q7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than LG Q7, because it has a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.