Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-06-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 494 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than LG Stylo 4, with a 98.9 score against 73.1. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier device than LG Stylo 4, but both have the same thickness. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better performing CPU than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a brighter screen than LG Stylo 4, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a little larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than LG Stylo 4, because it has a lot higher 108 MP resolution camera, a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage to install games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with improved battery lifetime than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 4. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG Stylo 4, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.