Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.49 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2015-10-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a score of 11.76 against 9.49. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is way newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a display that's just as good as the display in Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a camera with a lot better resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a 16% smaller battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, resigning some specifications.