Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 71.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-11-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aqua blue, Mineral grey and Satin coral |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G25 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Moto E7's overall score of 71.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than Moto E7, and they were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Moto E7 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto E7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto E7, because it has a little bigger screen, a lot higher pixels number per display inch and a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Moto E7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more memory for games and applications than Moto E7, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto E7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.