Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.49 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-09-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Misty blue and Twilight orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 11.76, which is much better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus's 9.49 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is thinner but just a little heavier than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and both of them were released only 1 months apart. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 11 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit bigger display and a much better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior processing unit than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
