Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 72.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-05-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 127.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 494 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto G4 Plus, getting a score of 98.9 against 72.1. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a lot newer and thinner phone than the Moto G4 Plus, although it is way heavier. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more powerful processor than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better display than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bit better pixels density, a bigger screen and a way higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video and a camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G4 Plus. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.