Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.39 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-03-31 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Moto G5 Plus, with a general score of 11.76 against 9.39. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way heavier than the Moto G5 Plus, it's thinner and notably newer. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a little higher pixels amount in each display inch, a much bigger display and a way better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery duration than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more MP back facing camera and a lot better video resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G5 Plus, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.