Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-26 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aqua Green and Steel Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Moto G50, getting a general score of 98.9 against 75.3. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Moto G50 were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than Moto G50. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Moto G50 has Android 11 version, offering a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Motorola Moto G50, because it has a bit larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a way greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than Moto G50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G50, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G50 has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.