Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.93 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-08-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.91 x 2.89 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 8937 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Motorola Moto G5S, getting a 11.76 score against 8.93. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto G5S has Android 7.1 Nougat version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is much newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G5S's, although it's a lot heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper screen than Moto G5S, because it has a much bigger display, a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit better screen density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G5S, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better performing processor than Moto G5S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Moto G5S, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video, a much better video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The Motorola Moto G5S features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a 33% smaller battery capacity.