Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Moto G7, getting a 98.9 score against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer cellphone than the Moto G7, although it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a little bigger display, a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater performance than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G7, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a much better video resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G7, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.