Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.92 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1512 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Moto G7 Play, having a score of 11.76 against 8.92. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 11 version while Moto G7 Play has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body has the same thickness than Moto G7 Play, but it is heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater processing power than Moto G7 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G7 Play, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a larger screen and a way greater display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Play, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Play, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and videos, a lot higher video definition, a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Moto G7 Play, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G7 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G7 Play. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G7 Play, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.