Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 74.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue and Turquoise |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite's 74.3 global score. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and they were only released 4 months apart.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a little larger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a lot higher pixel density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with way more megapixels. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G8 Power Lite, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than Moto G8 Power Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.