Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 74.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2015-09-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola Moto X Style, having a 98.9 score against 74.1. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a way newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto X Style, although it is somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better performing CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 50% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a lot larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.