Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.03 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-09-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3510mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Moto Z Play Droid, having a score of 11.76 against 9.03. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is much newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z Play Droid. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better looking display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen and a larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger aperture for better low light images and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Moto Z Play Droid counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has just 3510mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.