Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-10-12 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Space blue and Ultra violet |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P70 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola One Macro, having a 11.76 score against 9.26. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and a little bit thinner phone than the Motorola One Macro, although it's also somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher screen density and a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Macro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Macro features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a much higher video quality, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.