Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-09-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Power, having a 11.76 score against 9.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer and a little thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Motorola One Power. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 11 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper display than Motorola One Power, because it has a little higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola One Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Power has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega pixels camera.
