Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-02-06 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blush gold and Noir black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 1500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2510mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s 75.2 score. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an a little bit heavier and thicker device than the Motorola razr (2019). Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has more pixels per inch of display, a way higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way better video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is also cheaper than the Motorola razr (2019), making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.