Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-05-27 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a general score of 98.9 against 75.6. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster processor than nubia Red Magic 3. They have 12 GB of RAM and 8 cores. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera, a way larger camera sensor and faster 24 frames per second video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.