Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Hot Rod red and Eclipse black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, having a general score of 98.9 against 75.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10, so it gives you a couple nice extra features. Even when Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the nubia Red Magic 5G were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a little lighter and thinner.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has a greater screen density, a quite bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution and a lot better resolution back camera.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra one.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.