Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Moonlight Black and Pearl White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's general score of 74.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features and better performance. Even being the best we compare here, we must note that it is also heavier and just a bit thicker.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior processor than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.