Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A34, having a general score of 98.9 against 82.9. Both of these phones work with the same Android 13 operating system, so both of them should provide identical operating system features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A34, because it has a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display, a little bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.