Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.94 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-01-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 11.76, which is way better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s overall score of 8.94. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way newer than Galaxy A9 (2016), it's a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bigger screen and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A9 (2016) has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has just 4000mAh of battery size. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a way higher video resolution and a larger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.