Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is older, heavier and just a little bit thicker than vivo X70 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and vivo X70 Pro have similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater storage to store more apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro has a battery performance that's just as good as Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery duration, although the vivo X70 Pro has just 4450mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures in low-light environments, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.