Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, with a global score of 98.9 against 84.5. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an notably older phone than Xiaomi 14T Pro, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit lighter and a little thinner. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version and Xiaomi 14T Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features an extremely better processor than Xiaomi 14T Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Xiaomi 14T Pro features a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has worse video frame rate, a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.