Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's 88.9 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer, lighter and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, they have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 108 megapixels resolution and a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.