Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.02 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-26 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a 11.76 score against 9.02. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer and a little thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch of screen and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution, a much better video definition and a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.