Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 score. Although it's the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is much older, heavier and a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixels density. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photographs, better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features as much storage to store more apps and games as Galaxy Note 20, they have the same internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.