Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, getting a score of 90.8 against 83.1. Although it's the best we compare here, we must note that it's also a much older, notably heavier and a little thicker phone. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo and Galaxy Note 20 both feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has faster 120 fps video frame rate and a camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's storage capacity for applications and games is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.