Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's global score of 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it is just a little lighter. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater number of faster cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a same size display and the same screen density. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 both count with similar storage to install games and applications, both have exactly the same internal storage.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a back camera with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and better 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.